Cases 81 - 90 of 8,753
Hughley v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carden v. Gurley et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Shane Eugene Carden
Defendant:
Dr. Gurley and Mike Mull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anderson
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Eric Vernardo Odom
Defendant:
Ben H. Brooks and Jeffery Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sales v. Butler et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jerette Sales
Defendant:
Pamela Butler, Sgt. Walker, Ms. Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Officer Kopps(Inmate 1)
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Murphy
Defendant:
Officer Kopps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Macon v. Garner et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
James Isiah Macon
Defendant:
Sergeant Garner, Medical Staff and YesCare Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelayo v. Keyes (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Glenn Bonilla Pelayo
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell, Rick Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gholston v. Crabtree (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gholston
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
