Cases 31 - 40 of 22,836
Williams v. Bynum (INMATE 2)
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Williams
Defendant:
Mason Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Smith
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell and A.D.O.C.
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera-Garcia v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Abigal Rivera-Garcia
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Somerville v. Limestone County Sheriffs Department et al
as 5:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Fred Somerville
Defendant:
Limestone County Sheriffs Department, Mike Blakely and Joey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Kimberley
as 1:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Isaac Jerome Smith
Respondent:
M. Kimberley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
Angela Johnson
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Greene v. Pipes et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Raymond Shane Greene
Defendant:
Wesley S. Pipes, Mary B. Windom, Mark S. Tunstall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhodes v. Clay County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
William Alan Rhodes
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center, Henry Lambert, Clay County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
