Cases 101 - 110 of 16,743
Titus v. White Castle et al
as 4:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
White Castle, Bank of America, Sparks Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barefield v. Conway et al
as 4:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Keya Deonte Barefield
Defendant:
Cynthia Conway, Joseph Mahoney, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liscomb v. Randel et al
as 4:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Liscomb
Defendant:
Kenyen Randel, Antonio D Johnson, Jr, Tod Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Mortal Kombat et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Mortal Kombat, Mortal Kombat III Finish Him, Ogaras Imported Cars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ogbozor
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Jude Ogbozor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobbitt v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 4:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mason Bobbitt
Defendant:
US Marshals, USA and PCRDF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williamson v. Tilman et al
as 4:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williamson
Defendant:
Tilman, Higgins, Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lambert v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Dorletha Lambert, Dorletha Otey and Dorletha Brinkley
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Dexter Payne, Nurzuhal Faust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. USA
as 4:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Brandon Charles Martin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kidd v. Does
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Raymond Kidd
Defendant:
Does and Yell County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
