Cases 51 - 60 of 2,413
Younis et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 4:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Ramiz Younis, Zain Ramiz Younis, Zaina Ramiz Younis and others
Defendant:
Atony Blinken, Lloyd Austin, United States Department of State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
McGhee v. Woodruff County Arkansas et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Joshua McGhee
Defendant:
Woodruff County Arkansas and Phil Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Arkansas Highway Police
as 4:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Arkansas Highway Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Forrest v. USA
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Randy K Forrest
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Stanley v. McDermott
as 4:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Marsha Stanley
Defendant:
Teresa McDermott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Moytoy v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Ian Baylee Moytoy
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services, Richard Alan Lisemby, Paul Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Barlow v. US Customs Border Patrol et al
as 4:2023cv01152
Plaintiff:
Clinton C Barlow
Defendant:
US Customs Border Patrol, Dundalk Marine Terminal, US Customs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
O'Neal v. Pine Bluff, City of
as 4:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jerell O'Neal
Defendant:
Pine Bluff, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
White v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Edward White
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Randy Morgan, Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Stevens v. Dennis
as 4:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne Stevens
Defendant:
Jodi Raines Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
