Cases 81 - 90 of 22,168
Williams v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Matthew Williams
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowley v. Lemons et al
as 4:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Crowley
Defendant:
Lemons, Lee, Arce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holliday v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Russell Holliday
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and Lona McCastlain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Collins v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Darmartress Collins
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Chistopher Budnick, Toni Shockey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA et al
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Derrick Wade Smith
Defendant:
USA, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Pulaski County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Perry et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Marceese Watkins
Defendant:
Bledsoe, John Doe, Tyler Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Charlie Phillips and Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoulders v. Hardy et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Roderick Davontae Shoulders
Defendant:
Hardy, Harmon, Musselwhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04022
Petitioner:
Travis Cain Lewis
Respondent:
State of Arkansas and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willingham v. Dobbs et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Christopher Willingham
Defendant:
James Dobbs, Barbra Strom and Everrte Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
