Cases 21 - 30 of 112,012
BROWN v. DIVISION OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00790
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL BROWN
Respondent:
DIVISION OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Mawhorr et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kameron Hawkins
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dan Mawhorr, Conrad Dyer, Cody Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Hayes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Bradford-Scott Data, LLC
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Mark Smith
Defendant:
Bradford-Scott Data, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
PEACHER v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00172
Petitioner:
ROBERT PEACHER
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonab v. Ginn
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Faraz Fadavi Akhavan Bonab
Defendant:
Samuel Ginn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
GHOLSTON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GHOLSTON
Defendant:
JASON CARTER, JAEKAR TEAH and CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CLARENCE BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
