Cases 11 - 20 of 10,205
Williams v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Matthew Williams
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Darmartress Collins
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Chistopher Budnick, Toni Shockey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA et al
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Derrick Wade Smith
Defendant:
USA, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Pulaski County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoulders v. Hardy et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Roderick Davontae Shoulders
Defendant:
Hardy, Harmon, Musselwhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willingham v. Dobbs et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Christopher Willingham
Defendant:
James Dobbs, Barbra Strom and Everrte Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Westbrook et al
as 2:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
T Westbrook, Tyrone Allison and Moses Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Norman Shaw and Norman Shaw, Jr
Defendant:
Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
James Gibson, Shipman, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weeks v. Arkansas Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Thomas W Hurst, Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Dexter Payne, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
