Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 94,760
Kubica v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv04217
Petitioner:
Anton Michael Kubica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Settles v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00258
Petitioner:
Andrew Settles
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gomez v. Andes
as 3:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
John B. Gomez
Respondent:
Warden Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McColl v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
James John McColl
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whisler v. Hernandez
as 3:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
Zebulon Whisler
Respondent:
Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsey #333281 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
Jason Christopher Lindsey, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dayton #355356 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Robert Guy Dayton, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Staci Ibarra and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Callioux v. Strange et al
as 2:2024cv00687
Petitioner:
Mr. Robert R.D. Callioux
Respondent:
Secretary Cheryl Strange and Superintendent Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lerma #080531 v. Thornell
as 2:2024cv01148
Petitioner:
Alfredo Lerma
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Taylor v. District Attorney
as 2:2024cv01400
Petitioner:
Robert A. Taylor
Respondent:
District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
