District Court Cases in North Carolina

Cases filed
Cases 81 - 90 of 87,537
Manglik v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Amit Manglik
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bhalla et al v. Nye, IV et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff: Varun K Bhalla and Allison C Bhalla
Defendant: John E Nye, IV, Joshua Eran Nye, Cynthia Thibault Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Briddell v. City of Shelby, et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: Angelita Briddell
Defendant: City of Shelby and John White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
WOODBURY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff: DANIEL WOODBURY
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Hensley v. Engler et al
as 5:2024cv00273
Plaintiff: Jason Hensley
Defendant: John A. Engler, Megan E. Gooding, North Carolina Medical Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hines v. USA
as 3:2024cv00482
Petitioner: Warren Eugene Hines, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Haynes v. Quinn et al
as 5:2024cv00125
Defendant: FNU Starowicz, FNU Quinn, FNU Lay and others
Plaintiff: Robert Jeremy Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLOSNER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00411
Petitioner: TERRY JAMES CLOSNER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hubbard v. Southwood Realty Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00481
Plaintiff: Justin Hubbard
Defendant: Southwood Realty Company

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?