Fourth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,392
Hardy v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv05006
Plaintiff:
Gary Hardy
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cunningham v. American Red Cross et al
as 3:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Latoya K. Cunningham
Defendant:
American Red Cross, The American National Red Cross and American National Red Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rice v. Mingo Logan Coal LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00629
Defendant:
Arch Resources, Inc., Mingo Logan Coal LLC and Arch Coal, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McDowell et al v. Jasper County
as 9:2023cv04706
Plaintiff:
Buford "Chad" McDowell and Rachel Riley
Defendant:
Jasper County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Horowitz v. Jasper County
as 9:2023cv04700
Plaintiff:
Michael Horowitz
Defendant:
Jasper County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shaw v. Haynes Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv04672
Plaintiff:
Beverly Ann Shaw
Defendant:
Haynes Incorporated and MIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
National Labor Relations Board v. Lockhart et al
as 8:2023cv02504
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Lawrence Lockhart and Lawrence J. Lockhart Enterprises, LLC
Amos et al v. NAPA Management Services Corporation
as 7:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Barry D Amos, Luis Arce, Andrew Barton and others
Defendant:
NAPA Management Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lathon v. United Summit Center, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ladonna Lathon
Defendant:
United Sumit Center, Inc. and United Summit Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Barnes v. South Carolina State University
as 5:2023cv04449
Plaintiff:
Dawn Barnes
Defendant:
South Carolina State University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
