US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,107
FRANKLIN v. TOWN OF NORWOOD et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SCOTT FRANKLIN
Defendant:
TOWN OF NORWOOD, TRENTEN JAMAR WEATHERS, JOHNATHAN LEE FURR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
COLEMAN v. MAUNEY et al
as 1:2023cv01127
Plaintiff:
DEANNA COLEMAN and AUGUSTINE PEREZ
Defendant:
CHASE MAUNEY, SHERIFF SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE, ADAM D MOSQUEDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DAVIS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv01122
Plaintiff:
SONYA DAVIS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WOOD v. FKH SFR C1, L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv01114
Defendant:
FKH SFR C1, L.P., CERBERUS SFR HOLDINGS II, L.P., FIRSTKEY HOMES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYNN WOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
LEE COUNTY v. HAUBER
as 1:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
LEE COUNTY
Defendant:
CHAD HAUBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BANKS v. ALAMANCE-BURLINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 1:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
Keisha Banks
Defendant:
ALAMANCE-BURLINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
