US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
ALLEN v. COOPER et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, N.C. STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JENNIFER ELWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
DOUGLAS v. CRISCO et al
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
MARIA DOUGLAS
Defendant:
KYLE CRISCO and CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA and KOURY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
GLENN v. CLAYTON et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
GURLEY E. GLENN
Defendant:
GERALD CLAYTON, DOUGLAS R HARRISON, EDWARD HOUGH WILLAFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
