US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,107
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. BERGER, et al
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, COMMON CAUSE, MITZI REYNOLDS TURNER and others
Defendant:
PHILIP BERGER, TIMOTHY MOORE, DESTIN HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971 Voting Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
JOHNSON v. PFEIFFER UNIVERSITY et al.
as 1:2023cv01087
Plaintiff:
TAL JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
PFEIFFER UNIVERISTY, SUSAN BLAIR, ELIZABETH FAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSTON v. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
as 1:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
MARY JOHNSTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01078
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
