North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 30,378
Ali v. Dexter et al
as 5:2024ct03103
Plaintiff:
Abdulkadir Sharif Ali
Defendant:
Janet M. Dexter, Hunter Fonvielle, Kayla Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodge v. Cook
as 5:2024ct03104
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Hodge
Defendant:
Dr. Patrick Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hernandez v. Stein et al
as 1:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ and RA SAADI LENNOX HERNANDEZ EL
Respondent:
JOSHUA H. STEIN, JAMIE BULLARD and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AZAR EL v. CABARRUS COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL doing business as JERIMY LOVE
Respondent:
CABARRUS COUNTY, CABARRUS COUNTY JAIL, MIKE DOWNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Medina v. USA
as 3:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Felix Medina
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Alexander v. USA
as 3:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
James Arden Alexander
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Morgan v. USA
as 5:2024cv00113
Petitioner:
Dorian Michael Morgan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hallman v. USA
as 3:2024cv00450
Petitioner:
Cameron Jamond Hallman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rojo v. USA
as 3:2024cv00446
Petitioner:
Agustin Bueno Rojo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Willis v. Ruff et al
as 5:2024ct03102
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Defendant:
Mark C. Ruff, City Of Fayetteville, Sgt. James Yowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
