Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 141 - 150 of 66,777
Collins v. Dauzat
as 24-30306
Petitioner: Richard F. Collins, Jr.
Respondent: Michele Dauzat, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Campbell v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01910
Petitioner: Joel Campbell
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff: Cedric Hill
Defendant: Ward Calhoun
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00034
Petitioner: Travis Edward Anderson
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barragan Farias v. USA
as 3:2024cv01136
Petitioner: Jorge Luis Barragan Farias
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Vidal v. USA
as 3:2024cv01135
Petitioner: Tommy Ray Vidal
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Corrales v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00168
Petitioner: Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent: Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Duarte-Vasquez v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Duarte-Vasquez
Respondent: Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Baker v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00173
Petitioner: Thomas C. Baker
Respondent: Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Lumpkin
as 24-10419
Petitioner: Marcus Quin Butler
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?