Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 66,646
Pretel v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Francisco Valencia Pretel
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Calzada v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Evelio Calzada
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brantley v. Lumpkin
as 24-10363
Petitioner:
Ross Thomas Brantley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Ortiz v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01608
Petitioner:
Anthony Ortiz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00150
Petitioner:
Antoine Thomas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01514
Petitioner:
Michael William Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00985
Petitioner:
James McCoy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Terry County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Gibson, Jr.
Respondent:
Terry County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia-Romeo v. Colbert
as 3:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Garcia-Romeo
Defendant:
Warden D. Colbert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
