Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 81 - 90 of 66,544
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-20160
Petitioner: Ernesto Garcia
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 24-10332
Petitioner: Jecole DeKeith Jackson
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Conner v. Warden Caddo Correctional
as 24-30248
Petitioner: Albertus Conner, Jr.
Respondent: Warden Caddo Correctional Center
Hinton v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00109
Petitioner: Cordell Deonzio Hinton
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 24-40240
Petitioner: Jacob Alan Powell
Respondent: Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40235
Petitioner: Pedro Enrique Barzola Garcia
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
McCann v. Terrell et al
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: Frankie L. McCann, Jr.
Defendant: Cynthia Terrell, Kevin Stevenson and Mike Mozingo
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Borges-Milko v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00496
Plaintiff: Vilomar Borges-Milko and Milko Vilomar-Borge
Defendant: Felipe Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Caston v. Tucker
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff: Bernard B. Caston
Defendant: Randy Tucker
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hawkins v. State of Miss.
as 1:2024cv00075
Petitioner: George Verlon Hawkins
Respondent: State of Miss.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?