Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 66,544
Ortiz-Castillo v. Calcasieu Correctional Center et al
as 2:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Antonia Ortiz-Castillo
Defendant:
Calcasieu Correctional Center and Tony Mancuso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lee v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Kyson Dewayne Lee
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
John v. Grant et al
as 3:2024cv00957
Petitioner:
Robert Charles John
Respondent:
NFN Grant and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Briones v. Lumpkin
as 24-10348
Petitioner:
Jose Nieves Briones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Sparkman v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Nakeith C Sparkman
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Cain et al
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Dennis Thompson
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Stevenson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Aaron Blake Wood
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Briggs v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00327
Petitioner:
Charles Wade Briggs
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briggs v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Charles Wade Briggs
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
