Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 66,544
Johnson v. Dauzat
as 5:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
Michelle Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Star v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
David Lee Star
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Anthony Deundra Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Jackson, Security Warden Unknown Andrews, Chief Unknown Perry and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Wilson et al
as 4:2024cv00326
Petitioner:
Ronnie Turner
Respondent:
Sharon Wilson, Richard Bland and Andrea Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00890
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01387
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fregia v. Warden Marshall, et al.
as 6:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
Kirk Asa Fregia, Sr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enriquez v. Mares
as 6:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Respondent:
Warden FNU Mares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Bickham
as 24-30246
Petitioner:
Allen Odell Woods
Respondent:
Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
