Sixth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 70,836
Hayes v. White et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Dawn Hayes
Defendant:
Patrick White and Paul Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
King et al v. Quad-R, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Dillon King and Allison King
Defendant:
Quad-R, Inc. doing business as Rae Products Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Brooks v. Roetting
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Shareena Brooks
Defendant:
Micahel P Roetting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nationwide Recovery, Incorporated, et al v. City of Detroit, MI
as 24-1401
Plaintiff:
NATIONWIDE RECOVERY, INCORPORATED, JULIA HUSSEIN, HUSSEIN M. HUSSEIN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Albert Pickett, Jr., et al v. City of Cleveland, OH
as 24-3395
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PICKETT, JR., KEYONNA JOHNSON, JAROME MONTGOMERY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH
Amicus Curiae:
NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
Baird v. Nessel et al
as 4:2024cv11205
Plaintiff:
Mr. Richard Baird
Defendant:
Ms. Dana M Nessel, Ms. Fadwa Hammoud and Kym L. Worthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cunningham et al v. Allegan, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Sherry Cunningham, Gary Day, Josette Day and others
Defendant:
Allegan, County of and Sally L. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
