Seventh Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 31,249
John Couch v. State of Indiana, et al
as 24-1655
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. COUCH
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, NOBLESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Timothy Stewart, Sr. v. Drew Severson, et al
as 24-1653
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY L. STEWART, SR.
Defendant:
DREW SEVERSON, AISHA BRUNTON, MICHAEL PALMER and others
Hovermale v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hovermale
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
David Wilkerson v. Timothy Chamberlain, et al
as 24-1645
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILKERSON
Defendant:
TIMOTHY CHAMBERLAIN, BESSIE DOMINGUEZ, Doctor, SUSAN TUELL and others
John Couch v. City of Indianapolis, Indiana, et al
as 24-1644
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. COUCH
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA, JOSEPH HOGSETT, Mayor of Indianapolis, IN and others
Benavidez v. Lippert Components, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BENAVIDEZ
Defendant:
LIPPERT COMPONENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of Wisconsin Marathon County Child Support Agency v. Milbeck, Ryan
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
State of Wisconsin Marathon County Child Support Agency
Defendant:
Ryan William Milbeck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jones
as 1:2024cv03168
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welborn v. Truitt et al
as 1:2024cv03165
Plaintiff:
Francine Welborn
Defendant:
Charles Truitt and John Doe Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Boyer v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc
as 1:2024cv03169
Plaintiff:
Gregory Boyer
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc
Cross Defendant:
Gallagher Bassett Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
