Indiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 212
DEBOARD v. URBAN STATION, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03488
Defendant:
URBAN STATION, LLC and H.M. MAC DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEBOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DEBOARD v. MONON LOFTS, LP et al
as 1:2019cv03341
Defendant:
Monon Lofts, LP, TWG CONSTRUCTION, LLC and TWG DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEBOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DEBOARD v. WATERSTONE AT GREEN RIVER, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00145
Defendant:
WATERSTONE AT GREEN RIVER, LLC and GOEBEL COMMERCIAL REALTY, INC.
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEBOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Black v. Friedrichsen et al
as 1:2019cv00307
Defendant:
Morris Kelsey, Interstate Realty Management Co, Erika Holiday and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DEBOARD et al v. WARRICK TRAIL APARTMENTS, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00131
Defendant:
Warrick Trail Apartments, LLC and CHANDLER REAL ESTATE, INC.
Plaintiff:
Chandler Real Estate, LLC and DAVID DEBOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FIRST MERCHANTS BANK
as 1:2019cv02365
Defendant:
FIRST MERCHANTS BANK
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Black v. Friedrichsen et al
as 1:2019cv00222
Defendant:
Naomi Friedrichsen, Interstate Reality Management Co, Erika Holiday and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra A. Black and Sandra Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. PELTZ SHOES, INC.
as 1:2019cv01913
Plaintiff:
PRINCESS SCOTT
Defendant:
PELTZ SHOES INC and PELTZ SHOES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEBOARD v. SILA CAPITAL, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00895
Defendant:
Sila Capital, LLC, Echo Park, LLC and H.M. Mac Construction, LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEBOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CARSON v. CITIZENS ENERGY GROUP
as 1:2018cv03795
Defendant:
CITIZENS ENERGY GROUP
Plaintiff:
JA'DAWN A. CARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
