US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Social Security Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 1,311
Osman v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00334
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Danika C. Osman
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bealmear v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00010
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Christine E Bealmear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Hendrickson v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00224
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Austin James Shanor Hendrickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Conrad v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Tabatha L Conrad
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Mcclure v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00020
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Mcclure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Anderson v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00131
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Christina Anderson
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Ritrovato v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00003
Plaintiff:
Cheryl R. Ritrovato
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Graham v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Tia L Graham
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Dixon v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00016
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Dixon
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brumbaugh v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00013
Plaintiff:
Alexandria N. Brumbaugh
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.