Ninth Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 28,501
Mike Bowman v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Mike Bowman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Pamela Stewart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(SS) Palmer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Anthony Palmer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Krebs v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Nathan Krebs
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodriguez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03059
Plaintiff:
Francis Joe Rodriguez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Alfonso Lepe v. Martin J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Lepe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Noe Valdez v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03339
Plaintiff:
Noe Valdez
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Munger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Curtis Edward Munger
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Chaney v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Dillon J. Chaney
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Fisher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Melissa O Fisher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
