Ninth Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 28,501
Rolounda Vernea Robinson v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Rolounda Vernea Robinson
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rosalyn Unique McGee v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00803
Plaintiff:
Rosalyn Unique McGee
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Galczynski v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Devan A. Galczynski
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Briggs v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Holly M. Briggs
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Auapaau v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Dan Auapaau
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05292
Plaintiff:
Loulissa Thompson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tallberg v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
Jon M Tallberg
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hudson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00851
Plaintiff:
Jason Hudson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jordan v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02219
Plaintiff:
Brandy J. Jordan
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Juan Carlos Vizaga v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Vizaga
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
