US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Cases 131 - 140 of 15,626
Key Tronic Corporation v. Fio Corporation
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Key Tronic Corporation
Defendant:
Fio Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Carlson et al v. Adams County et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Chauna Carlson and Andrew Carlson
Defendant:
Adams County, Adams County Sheriffs Office, Adams County Sheriff Dale Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hedwig v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03050
Plaintiff:
Kirk Vincent Hedwig
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
First Interstate Bank v. Wall Street Apartments, LLC
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
First Interstate Bank
Defendant:
Wall Street Apartments, LLC
Interested Party:
Alaa Elkharwily
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Huezo v. Haynes
as 4:2024cv05037
Petitioner:
Juan Luna Huezo
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blueline Equipment Co LLC et al v. Kokanovic et al
as 1:2024cv03051
Plaintiff:
Blueline Equipment Co LLC and Blueline Mfg Co
Defendant:
Momcilo Kokanovic, Miodrag Kokanovic and Marko Kokanovic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ritchie v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Ann Ritchie
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Marino v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05036
Plaintiff:
Jeramie Marino
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
