US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 126,512
Coleman v. Holpzapfell
as 5:2024cv00229
Petitioner:
Stye Lamar Coleman
Respondent:
Holpzapfell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tolliver v. Barker et al.
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Hiram Tolliver
Defendant:
D. R. Barker, K. L. Ross, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Compton v. Conner et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Compton
Defendant:
J. Conner, A. Ross and FCI-Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barnett v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Betty Barnett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Moore v. Tom's Plumbing, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Tom's Plumbing, Inc. doing business as Mullen Plumbing, Heating and Cooling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ruth Henderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hernandez v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Marco Hernandez
Defendant:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00223
Petitioner:
Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Su v. Ben's Creek Operations WV LLC
as 2:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Ben's Creek Operations WV LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
