US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Cases 51 - 60 of 126,494
Williams v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Marshall Luther Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Baisi v. Western Regional Jail
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gregory Baisi
Defendant:
Western Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baisi v. Bleavins et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gregory Baisi
Defendant:
Cpl. John Bleavins, Lt. James Irwin, Western Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mace v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Breanna D. Mace
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Cassie Jackson, John Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Brown v. Farrell et al
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Brown
Defendant:
Paul T. Farrell, Tim Armstead, Elizabeth D. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGranahan v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Joseph McGranahan
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., PrimeCare Medical, Inc. and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toler v. Truist Bank
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Shawnda Toler
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Skidmore v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
James M. Skidmore
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Phillips et al v. Galisky
as 2:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Dustin Phillips and Aaron Hallof
Respondent:
Darren Galisky
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
J.R. v. Shafer
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
J. R.
Defendant:
Chad Shafer
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
