Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Cases filed

Cases 31 - 40 of 24,627
USA v. 51999 Dollars in US Currency et al
as 2:2015cv00363
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: 51999 Dollars in US Currency, 5000 Dollars in US Currency
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property - Other
USA v. 671029 Dollars in US Currency
as 2:2015cv00364
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: 671029 Dollars in US Currency
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property - Other
United States of America v. TWENTY EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($28,500.00)
as 1:2015cv21860
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture - currency reporting violation
United States of America v. TWENTY EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($28,500.00)
as 0:2015cv61030
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture - currency reporting violation
United States of America v. $105,099.00 in United States Currency
as 1:2015cv00192
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $105,099.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $221,006.35 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2015cv03667
Defendant: $221,006.35 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
USA v. Parcel of land identified as Lot number 17 in the inscription plan of the Costa Verde Development
as 3:2015cv01595
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Parcel of land identified as Lot number 17 in the inscription plan of the Costa Verde Development
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $10,800.00 in United States Currency et al
as 5:2015cv05107
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $10,800.00 in United States Currency, $40,000.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Approximately $5,630.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2015at00584
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $5,630.00 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.