District of Alabama Court Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 57,445
Davis v. Dianne (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00350
Plaintiff: Jack A. Davis
Defendant: Nurse Dianne
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Dubose v. Hueytown, City of et al
as 2:2015cv00852
Plaintiff: Carlton Dubose
Defendant: Hueytown, City of, Chuck Hagler, James Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Burts v. Alabama Department of Corrections, State of et al
as 2:2015cv00853
Petitioner: Tyrone Burts
Respondent: Alabama Department of Corrections, State of, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Steward
as 1:2015cv00276
Petitioner: Neil Robinson
Respondent: Cythain Steward
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00855
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Russell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 3:2015cv00856
Plaintiff: Jeffery Russell
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv00854
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Age)
Gibbs v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2015cv00858
Plaintiff: Lashonja Gibbs
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Woods v. American United Life Insurance Company
as 1:2015cv00859
Plaintiff: Laresea Woods
Defendant: American United Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Gibbs v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00275
Plaintiff: Lashonja Gibbs
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.