Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,518
Newby v. Grantham et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ricardo Newby
Defendant:
Madison Grantham, Mary B. Roberson and Steven T. Speakman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Fisher et al
as 7:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Dr. Fisher, Nurse Practicioner Lee, Warden Hutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harbour v. Cryer et al
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Trenece L Harbour
Defendant:
John Cryer, Marshall Woodward, Bud Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sales v. Butler et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jerette Sales
Defendant:
Pamela Butler, Sgt. Walker, Ms. Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, K. Albritton, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Smithart et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Rashad C. Lee
Defendant:
Burt Smithart, Ben Reeves and Rebecca Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Burns
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Markus OShea Payne
Defendant:
Sherry Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuqua v. Morgan County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Justin Fuqua
Defendant:
Morgan County Jail and Trent McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeton v. Maddox (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant:
Andrew L. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Ross et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Maureen Nicole Adams
Defendant:
Somer Lemere Ross and GEO - ATEF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
