US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 131 - 140 of 429,417
Kuhn v. Nations Direct Mortgage, LLC
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Jason Kuhn
Defendant:
Nations Direct Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
KUHN v. NATIONS DIRECT MORTGAGE LLC
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
JASON KUHN
Defendant:
NATIONS DIRECT MORTGAGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crews Marine, Inc. v. RLI INSURANCE COMPANY
as 4:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Crews Marine, Inc.
Defendant:
RLI INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WESTWOOD PLAZA LLC v. CITI TRENDS INC
as 4:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
WESTWOOD PLAZA LLC
Defendant:
CITI TRENDS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BURNS v. GOOLDIN et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE KAIN BURNS and KEVIN LEE
Defendant:
CHERYL GOOLDIN, JOHN GOOLDIN, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
INGRAM v. USA
as 3:2024cv00172
Petitioner:
KADEEM INGRAM
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MATHEWS v. STREEIT et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
J STREEIT and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICHEL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
JEFFREY MICHEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
