Eastern District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases

Mandamus and Other Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 418
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015hc02088
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Motion to Determine Mental Compentency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015hc02080
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Motion to Determine Mental Compentency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015hc02081
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Motion to Determine Mental Compentency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015hc02064
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Motion to Determine Mental Compentency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015hc02053
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Motion to Determine Mental Compentency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv00046
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv00038
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015hc02017
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Commitment of a Sexually Dangerous Person
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014hc02255
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Motion to Determine Mental Compentency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014hc02245
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Motion to Determine Mental Compentency/Other Dist.
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.