US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 11 - 20 of 37,604
Steed v. Lynch et al
as 5:2024ct03105
Plaintiff:
Byron Steed
Defendant:
Sgt. Lynch, Sgt. Bunn, Sgt. Hobgood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $291,740.00 in US Currency
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$291,740.00 in US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
RLI Insurance Company v. Bailey et al
as 7:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
RLI Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jeff Bailey, Sheri Bailey and Southern Glass & Mirror of Eastern North Carolina, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hatfield v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Roy Jack Hatfield
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Optimal Sante, LLC v. Mediforum Co. Ltd. et al
as 5:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Optimal Sante, LLC
Defendant:
Mediforum Co. Ltd. and Jae Hong Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Weikel v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Willard Francis Weikel
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shao v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2024cv00127
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Murdock Ready Mix Concrete v. Ironplanet, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Murdock Ready Mix Concrete
Defendant:
Ironplanet, Inc., Jake Lawson, Brian Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
