North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 30,375
Chapman v. USA
as 5:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Michael Jarrell Chapman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Johnson v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02088
Petitioner:
Marty Johnson
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cromartie v. Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2024hc02089
Petitioner:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Respondent:
Department of Adult Correction, Todd Ishee, Roy Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2024hc02087
Petitioner:
Patrick White
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smart v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2024ct03100
Plaintiff:
Michael Trevor Smart
Defendant:
S. Hawkins, Associate Warden Bennett, Sergeant Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank v. USA
as 3:2024cv00431
Petitioner:
Kyris Jordan Frank
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gaddy v. Alexander Correction Institution et al
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Brandon A Gaddy
Defendant:
Alexander Correction Institution, FNU Panero, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUMITIE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00360
Petitioner:
THADDEUS THEOPALIS CRUMITIE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BALDWIN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00361
Petitioner:
LA'REGINALD TREDARIUS BALDWIN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ELLIS v. GORDER
as 1:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
KENNETH JERMAINE ELLIS
Respondent:
R. VAN GORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
