North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 30,325
Lutz v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02082
Petitioner:
Joshua D. Lutz
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LAFOND v. USA
as 1:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
JUVONTA DESHAUN LAFOND
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SPRAUVE v. UNKNOWN OFFICIAL AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
JON C. SPRAUVE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIAL AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. SHU STAFF AT UNITED STATES PENITENTARY
as 1:2024cv00309
Petitioner:
MARCUS DONTRIEL CHAMBERS
Respondent:
SHU STAFF AT UNITED STATES PENITENTARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
v. Rangel Gonzales et al
as 5:2024hc02079
Defendant:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rangel Gonzales v. Rowe
as 5:2024hc02080
Petitioner:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holland v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Markas L. Holland
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oladokun v. Kelly
as 5:2024ct03091
Plaintiff:
Oladayo Oladokun
Defendant:
Warden L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Boyd v. USA
as 3:2024cv00383
Petitioner:
Patrick Jerome Boyd
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rosado v. Langdon et al
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Rosado, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Langdon, Cindy Hayes, Kevin Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
