Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 7,753
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Leo Lamont Jones
Defendant:
Rutherford County and James Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
as 3:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pendleton v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Pendleton
Defendant:
Randy Kennedy, Elizabeth A. Johnson, Andra Hedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #039 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
John Doe #039
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Smith v. Meigs County Government et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ALEXANDER SMITH
Defendant:
MEIGS COUNTY GOVERNMENT and ROBERT J LEONARD
Intervenor:
Kenneth Andrew Colbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bosan v. University Place Senior Living SE LP et al
as 2:2024cv02140
Plaintiff:
Rick Bosan
Defendant:
University Place Senior Living SE LP, Memphis Housing Authority, Department of Housing and Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Doe #038 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
John Doe #038
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #041 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
John Doe #041
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
