District Court Cases in Wisconsin
Cases 41 - 50 of 46,259
Suprise v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Stephanie M Suprise
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Comer v. Hagerty Inc
as 2:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Colin Comer
Defendant:
Hagerty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
State of Wisconsin Marathon County Child Support Agency v. Milbeck, Ryan
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
State of Wisconsin Marathon County Child Support Agency
Defendant:
Ryan William Milbeck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carroll v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Jermichael Carroll
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Briggs et al
as 2:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Eric Darcell Walker, Jr
Defendant:
Director Briggs, Warden Jason Benzel, CO B Kapolnek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Puchner v. Maxwell et al
as 2:2024cv00478
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Mike Maxwell, Lisa Neubauer, Eric Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. Sarnowski et al
as 2:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Thomas Sarnowski, Ms Archer and Ms Paulson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
