Cases 1 - 10 of 962
Corrales v. Robinson
as 24-40398
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent:
S. Robinson, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute Beaumont Low
v. Federal Corrections Institute - Dublin et al
as 3:2024cv03318
Defendant:
Federal Corrections Institute - Dublin, Nicholas Ramos and Mr. Andrew Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Pate v. Warden FCI
as 24-50428
Petitioner:
Frank Edwin Pate
Respondent:
Warden Federal Correctional Institution La Tuna Camp
Robert Michael Handlon v. Federal Correctional Institution Lompoc
as 2:2024cv03406
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Handlon
Respondent:
Federal Correctional Institution Lompoc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kafeiti v. Hijar
as 24-50242
Petitioner:
Charles Kafeiti
Respondent:
S. Hijar, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution La Tuna
Vargas v. Ashland Federal Correctional Institution
as 0:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Javier Vargas
Defendant:
Ashland Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Escalona-Reid v. Federal Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Willmer Dimitri Escalona-Reid
Defendant:
F C I Oakdale II, Federal Correctional Institution and Felipe Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Atchley v. Warden, Memphis Federal Correctional Institution
as 8:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Hal Maxim Atchley
Respondent:
Warden, Memphis Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bates v. Hijar
as 24-50062
Petitioner:
Bradley Bates
Respondent:
S. Hijar, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution La Tuna
Wesson v. Elkton Federal Correctional Institute
as 4:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Devontae Wesson
Defendant:
United States of America and Elkton Federal Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
