Cases 31 - 40 of 11,869
COLLINS v. SMITH
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. COUSINS and MICHAEL S. COLLINS
Defendant:
MARK SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORAN v. RANDOLPH et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
MILES TORAN
Defendant:
ISSAC RANDOLPH, CARLA COAKLEY, MADISEN GILBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RLB PROPERTIES LTD. v. DIAZ et al
as 1:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
RLB PROPERTIES LTD.
Defendant:
HUGO DIAZ, JONATHAN PADILLA, HUGE MUSIC GROUP, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
THOMAS v. HENRY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL D/B/A ALPHA HOME-A WATERS COMMUNITY et al
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
ROYAL THOMAS
Defendant:
HENRY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL D/B/A ALPHA HOME-A WATERS COMMUNITY, INFINITY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT OF INDIANA LLC and ALPHA HOME-A WATERS COMMUNITY LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YEANAY v. PERRY
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
MARKUS YEANAY
Defendant:
PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. FINCH et al
as 1:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
HECTOR FLORES, JR.
Defendant:
FINCH and HACKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAUGHMAN v. HUFF et al
as 1:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
KRISTOPHER BAUGHMAN
Defendant:
HUFF, GATIS and TITUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
CARLTON CLARK
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRICHFIELD v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
JANEY MARIE CRICHFIELD
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MOORMAN v. HILL et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
KIR MOORMAN
Defendant:
M HILL, FUMI and FADOTRIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
