Cases 1 - 10 of 10,063
SIMMONS-TAYLOR v. HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
TWANA SIMMONS-TAYLOR
Defendant:
HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL doing business as HAMILTON TRACE OF FISHERS, CARDON MANAGEMENT COMPANY II LLC and CARDON & ASSOCIATES INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HANNA v. YARBER et al
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN HANNA
Defendant:
YARBER, IVEY, RAMBIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AYON v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
MANUEL GARCIA AYON, JR.
Defendant:
FOSTER, AFOLAYAN, BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIYO LEWIS
Defendant:
BEDWELL, AIRMARK and FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE et al v. SEGLER CONCRETE FINISHING LLC
as 1:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE, INDIANASTATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS and CEMENT MASONS HEALTH, WELFARE, PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
SEGLER CONCRETE FINISHING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
JORDAN v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
DENZEL JORDAN
Respondent:
WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JEWEL v. KNOX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY GENE JEWEL, JR.
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. and DOUG VANTLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHIS v. JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
DAVID MATHIS, JR.
Defendant:
JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL doing business as MILLERS MERRY MANOR and MILLERS HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLEARY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
SHAWNA L. CLEARY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
