Cases 51 - 60 of 15,489
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00932
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Alexander v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 24-1053
Plaintiff:
JERIEL ALEXANDER
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
John Morris Anderson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 24-1718
Plaintiff:
JOHN MORRIS ANDERSON
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
United States of America v. Williams et al
as 5:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ronald B Williams, Mary Williams, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hopkins et al v. BMO Bank NA et al
as 2:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
David Hopkins and Patricia Hopkins
Defendant:
BMO Bank NA, Chase Bank NA, Betty D Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jonathan Gould v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 24-1704
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN GOULD
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA and JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
Van Damme v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al.
as 24-2481
Plaintiff:
ARMIN VAN DAMME
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., BNC NATIONAL BANK and others
Erickson, et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.
as 24-2498
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERICKSON and SHELLEY ANN ERICKSON
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., and its employees and or agents, REBECCA DIETRICH, in her individual capacity, and employee and.or agent for and as successor in interest and the Plaintiffs mortgage successor in interest WAMU other JP Morgan Chase NA, TARA L. TUCKER, notary in her individual capacity and employee and/or agent for other JP Morgan Chase and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
