Cases 41 - 50 of 487
Mario Sarabia v. Ricoh USA, Inc.
as 8:2020cv00218
Defendant:
DOES 1-50 all inclusive and Ricoh USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mario Sarabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mario Sarabia v. Ricoh USA, Inc.
as 2:2020cv01062
Defendant:
Ricoh USA, Inc. and DOES 1-50 all inclusive
Plaintiff:
Mario Sarabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KISHUN v. RICOH USA, INC.
as 2:2019cv19359
Defendant:
RICOH USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
Kishun Ronald and RONALD KISHUN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Midwest Athletics and Sports Alliances LLC v. Ricoh USA, Inc.
as 5:2019mc80266
Defendant:
Ricoh USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Midwest Athletics and Sports Alliances LLC
Petitioner:
Paul Andre
3Rd Party Defendant:
Eastman Kodak
Cassiopeia IP LLC v. Ricoh USA, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02557
Defendant:
Ricoh USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cassiopeia IP LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
v. RICOH USA, INC.
as 3:2019cv19359
Defendant:
RICOH USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
Kishun Ronald
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MIDWEST ATHLETICS AND SPORTS ALLIANCE LLC v. RICOH USA, INC.
as 2:2019cv03423
Defendant:
RICOH USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
MIDWEST ATHLETICS AND SPORTS ALLIANCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Farris et al v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2018cv04186
Defendant:
IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELAVAL TURBINE, INC.), BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC individually and as successor-in-interest, parent, alter ego and equitable trustee of BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to TODD SHIPYARD CORPORATION) and others
Plaintiff:
MELVA FARRIS and GARY FARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Theta Chip LLC v. Ricoh Imaging Americas Corporation
as 1:2019cv01178
Defendant:
Ricoh Imaging Americas Corporation
Plaintiff:
Theta Chip LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Midwest Athletics and Sports Alliance LLC v. Ricoh USA, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00514
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
