Cases 71 - 80 of 341
Citgo Petroleum Corporation v. MTI Connect LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01679
Plaintiff:
Citgo Petroleum Corporation
Defendant:
MTI Connect LLC and mGage LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
County of Marin v. Chevron Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv04935
Plaintiff:
County of Marin
Defendant:
Chevron Corp. , Chevron USA, Inc. , ExxonMobil Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
County of San Mateo v. Chevron Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv04929
Plaintiff:
County of San Mateo
Defendant:
Chevron Corp. , Chevron USA , ExxonMobil Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Imperial Beach v. Chevron Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv04934
Plaintiff:
City of Imperial Beach
Defendant:
Chevron Corp. , Chevron USA, Inc. , ExxonMobil Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VELAZQUEZ v. CITGO LINDEN et al
as 2:2017cv05958
Plaintiff:
CLAY VELAZQUEZ
Defendant:
CITGO LINDEN , CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION, PHILLIPS 66 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lauter v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation
as 4:2017cv02028
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Lauter
Defendant:
Citgo Petroleum Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Rhode Island v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 1:2017cv00204
Defendant:
Shell Petroleum, Inc., Valero Refining-Texas, L.P., CITGO Refining and Chemicals Company L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
CITGO Petroleum Corporation v. Raptis et al
as 1:2017cv03360
Plaintiff:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation
Defendant:
Jim Raptis and J.R. Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Turner et al v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation
as 1:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
John Turner and Patricia Turner
Defendant:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gottlieb v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation
as 9:2016cv81911
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gottlieb
Defendant:
Citgo Petroleum Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
