US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,456
Scott v. Reheard
as 6:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Brian Tyrone Scott
Respondent:
Deborah A. Reheard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Poindexter v. Haskell, Town of et al
as 6:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Poindexter
Defendant:
Haskell, Town of, Steve Arrowood, Jessica Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Employment Discrimination Rehabilitation Act
Henderson v. Officer Tharp et al
as 6:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Damon Henderson
Defendant:
Officer Tharp, Larry Crossland and Spiro, Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Carl Patterson
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Joseph Norwood, Connor Whitlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bullock v. Ritchie et al
as 6:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bullock
Defendant:
Jason Ritchie, Christyana Allen and Adair County Jail Trust Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Price v. Broken Arrow, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Harold Price
Defendant:
Broken Arrow, City of, Michael Spurgeon, Kenneth Schwab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
