Tenth Circuit Cases
Cases 128,291 - 128,300 of 245,070
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 6:2024cv01086
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Smith et al v. AJO Pizza LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Chase Smith
Defendant:
AJO Pizza LLC and Allen J Opie
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Kevin Stitt, Gentner Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Johnson v. Varela et al
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Christopher Varela, Bradley Vogan and FNU Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conrady v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03078
Petitioner:
Wyatt A. Conrady
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kompan AS et al v. Great Western Recreation LLC
as 1:2024mc00083
Plaintiff:
Kompan AS and Kompan Inc
Defendant:
Great Western Recreation LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cunha v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 5:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Darla Cunha
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Andre v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 2:2024cv02215
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Genrick Andre
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
EMC Property & Casualty Company v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
EMC Property & Casualty Company
Defendant:
Trevor Johnson, Crystal McMahon, Courtney Counter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
