Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,000
Jackson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2022cv01119
Petitioner:
Kim Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ulysses Charles Sneed v. Warden Holman CF
as 22-13328
Petitioner / Appellant:
ULYSSES CHARLES SNEED
Respondent / Appellee:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Alan Eugene Miller v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13136
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALAN EUGENE MILLER
Defendant / Appellant:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HOLMAN CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Darryl Stinski v. Warden GDCP
as 22-12898
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRYL SCOTT STINSKI
Respondent / Appellee:
GDCP WARDEN
JESSE BELL v. RICKY DIXON
as 1:2022cv00211
Petitioner:
Jesse Bell
Respondent:
Secretary RICKY DIXON and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Terry Raybon and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Westley Devone Harris
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2022cv00497
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eugene Smith
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOOKER v. DIXON et al
as 3:2022cv10939
Petitioner:
STEPHEN TODD BOOKER
Respondent:
Ricky Dixon and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOOKER v. DIXON et al
as 1:2022cv00204
Petitioner:
STEPHEN TODD BOOKER
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
