Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,000
Andrew R Allred v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12331
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW R ALLRED
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Lockhart v. Raybon
as 2:2022cv00368
Petitioner:
Courtney Larrell Lockhart
Respondent:
Warden Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockhart v. Raybon et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 3:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Courtney Lockhart
Defendant:
Terry Raybon and John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRAVEN v. DIXON et al
as 5:2022cv00122
Petitioner:
DANIEL JACOB CRAVEN, JR
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
CRAVEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00220
Petitioner:
Daniel Jacob Craven and DANIEL JACOB CRAVEN, JR
Respondent:
Secretary Ricky Dixon, Ashley Moody and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul Anthony Brown v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-11941
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Harry Franklin Phillips v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 22-11606
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARRY FRANKLIN PHILLIPS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
John Anthony Esposito v. Warden GDP
as 22-11538
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ANTHONY ESPOSITO
Respondent / Appellee:
GDCP WARDEN
Robert Shawn Ingram v. Warden Holman CF
as 22-11459
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT SHAWN INGRAM
Respondent / Appellee:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Leon Tollette v. Warden GDCP
as 22-11440
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEON TOLLETTE
Respondent / Appellee:
GDCP WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
