Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 34,032
Jones v. OGGA Napa Care F.R.J. et al
as 8:2024cv01172
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
OGGA Napa Care F.R.J.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Joseph
as 6:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Smith
Defendant:
Jean Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams, Lee A. v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv21879
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Williams
Defendant:
J. Lee, T. Anderson, Officer Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Vass v. Florida State Prison
as 8:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Jamal Leslie Vass
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. NICOLAS et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
KEION NATHANIEL CHAMBERS
Defendant:
C NICOLAS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Elroy Joshua Adams
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Cahill, Christopher A McLaurin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NelNet Program et al v. Dooley
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
NelNet Program and Antonio Deshone Dooley
Defendant:
Antonio D. Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vass v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Jamal Leslie Vass
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Cronin et al
as 5:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Earl Eugene Bates, Jr
Defendant:
Jeffery Cronin and John Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Woods
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis and Kathy Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
