Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 35,242
Brinson v. Beard et al
as 4:2025cv00027
Defendant:
Stribling, Brittney B Beard, Strickland and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lamar Brinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel LeClerc, Sr. v. Rozz, et al
as 25-10336
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALLEN LECLERC, SR.
Defendant:
ROZZ and BRANDI ROGERS
Johnnie Jordan, Jr. v. Brittney Sexton, et al
as 25-10343
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE LEE JORDAN, JR.
Defendant:
BRITTNEY SEXTON, CARSON TAYLOR, ALLEN and others
Matthew Tobin v. Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 25-10326
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW A. TOBIN
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OKALOOSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, FLORIDA STATE PRISON and others
Ralph Benning v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 25-10329
Plaintiff:
RALPH HARRISON BENNING
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF GEORGIA and COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Rogers v. Morgan et al
as 2:2025cv00162
Plaintiff:
Kavion Rogers
Defendant:
Warden P. Morgan, Capt. Wheat and W.E. Donaldson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. Hamm et al
as 1:2025cv00042
Plaintiff:
Deamfus Quantez Kimble
Defendant:
John Hamm, Kenneth Peters and Yes-Care Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vasquez v. Swain et al
as 3:2025cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Vasquez
Defendant:
Warden William Swain, Centurion Medical and Dr. Thomas Winters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2025cv00101
Plaintiff:
Clarence L. Bowens
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon and Dr. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Small v. Collier County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2025cv00078
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Small, Jr.
Defendant:
Collier County Sheriff's Office and Collier County Jail Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
